Legal Requirements - an excuse to impose Performance Appraisals
Hi guys, in this blog post I want to explain why we do not need to have Performance Appraisals in our companies for the sake of having “official written prof” about people´s performance.
Every time I speak at a conference about this topic (Abolishing Performance Appraisals) there are always a couple of voices pointing out to the fact that we cannot abolish Performance Appraisals because if companies need to fire people they need to have the written prof about the performance of the person and this prof comes from the yearly reports that managers fill in during the Performance Appraisal meeting.
Well let´s explore this idea… If this is really true, how is it possible that startups can fire people? Most of the startups do not have any Performance Appraisals sessions. This is a “virus” that usually Human Resource departments create when companies start growing. They think companies must become more professional and they must help their own employees. And as a result they install this obsolete process. So how come startups can fire people even without having Performance Appraisals in place?
I think the answer is quite easy. You do not need to have useless yearly meeting to make it official how good or bad you are performing, right? What companies need is to have a written prof about people´s performance if things go wrong. So why on earth people came up with the idea of having Performance Appraisals sessions for a legal reason?
Let me tell you a story… This is a real story that happened several years ago. This story will demonstrate how you can actually document everything that is needed to fire a person, or to protect a person if things go really wrong.
At that time I was working in a fantastic company, a world wide e-commerce company. To be honest I believe this company was one of the best companies if not the best company I ever worked in until today. Unfortunately, my manager was far from being a great manager. She had great manipulative skills, which were not used the right way.
I worked there as an Agile Coach. I worked with about 200 engineers around the world in three different continents. I knew exactly what were the problems that were affecting the engineering team and I was doing my best to help them. Like it happens in many other companies, my manager did not have any contact whatsoever with mine or team´s daily work, therefore she decided to dump me some interesting objectives she thought were important.
During months, I ignored her goals and concentrated on actions that would help the organisation and the teams to improve and become better until one day that something wrong started happening. Me and my boss we had a weekly 1:1, but we never exchanged any kind of written information, or at least not until I got the first email.
One day, after our 1:1 meeting, I got an email from her where she listed all the points that I was under-performing. Most of the points were related with her imposed goals. To be honest, at that time I did not even associate that action with any kind of legal action. I was just too upset and sad with that. It was a long , detailed and negative email where she listed all my “problems”. I still remember, not even one good thing was listed.
I do not have words to describe what I was feeling. I felt sad, frustrated and angry. Fortunately, I have great friends around me so I was able to talk with one of them and explained what was going on. When I finished the story he immediately told me: “Go to your lawyer, she is trying to get some proof to fire you.”. I followed his advice and I went to my lawyer who really confirmed what my friend told me. All that written information could be used against me legally.
I asked for the advice, what could I do to protect myself from that crap. I explained that people who worked with me loved my work and enjoyed to work with me. So how could I protect myself from what was happening? He immediately told me to use the same strategy, to gather a lot of written data so that I could prove my competence.
Next day I went home and I created a big online survey asking all different kind of questions about my professionalism and competence. That survey was sent to more than 200 engineers. The feedback was incredible, some answers stated that I helped them to become a better professionals and taught them things in few months that no one else was able to do it in years. On a scale from 0 (worst) to 10 (the best) the lowest grade in more than 70 answers was 8. That was the proof that I needed to protect myself in a legal way.
Few weeks later, the Human Resources (by the way when the heck are companies going to rename this crappy title? People are people, they are not resources ;) ) called me to their office. Of course I was already predicting what the topic was, so I printed out all the “legal proof” and took it with me to the meeting. “Surprisingly”, the HR director told me that we had an issue with my performance. I smiled and waited for him to finish.
After his speech, he asked me what should we do. At that point I showed the survey results to him. He was shocked with the outcome, then I asked: “So do you believe my manager who does not have any clue what I do, or do you believe 70 engineers who work with me on daily basis? If you guys want to go into court I am ready for it!”
I can tell you the guy was in shock! He did not have a clue what´s going on, he did not even know how to answer me. With so much information protecting myself they never dare to even touch on the topic. At the end, I changed to a different team with a different manager and at some point I was forced to leave and proceed with my life at another company (which is a fantastic company as well ) and I ´ve never heard about Human Resources any more, at least not regarding this topic.
The point of this history does not have anything to do with the fight between my ex-manager and myself. The idea of this story is much more powerful! As you can see we did not need any Performance Appraisals meeting to make information legal, we simply needed to have written information that could be used for any purposes. So next time you want to say we need to have Performance Appraisals meetings because of legal requirements think twice! You need to have the legal documentation, but you do not need to have Performance Appraisals.
Related to the written part and not so much to the Performance Appraisals, there is another topic the Human Resources departments mention several times. In their view, if you have written information about individual performance or personal development it´s easier for companies to manage situations where the manager leaves the job. Having everything written makes the transition easier for the new manager and for the employee since all information is in a written format.
In theory this might be the case, but my personal experience with dozens of managers tells me something different. Based on my experience in the majority of the cases this process does not work. Most of the new managers will ignore what happened in the past and will start from scratch with his employee. How many of you had some training planned and your new manager said “Well, let´s put it on hold for couple of months to see if this is really necessary”?
There are much better ways to do this handover. Couple of times I experienced something very powerful, something very simple, but extremely effective. In some companies, when a manager leaves the position, one of his responsibilities is to have a meeting with the employee and the new manager. This meeting serves the purpose to handover any information that is interesting and necessary to the new manager and to give the the employee an opportunity to explain what are the pending topics that must be addressed by the new manager.
It´s a very simple process, but it works very well. I really do not understand why companies don´t do it more often relying on official files that no one cares about. Sometimes the manager who is going to leave does not have the chance to meet the new manager. But there might be an an interim-manager who can do the handover and will then pass it to the final manager.
As you can see, legal requirements are a “good” excuse to force Performance Appraisals in companies. As I explained, you can have all the necessary information to take legal actions without having the need to execute Performance Appraisals.
This blog post is part of my new book that I am writing: Get Rid of Performance Appraisals that you can find here. If you are interested on the topic please subscribe as a Beta Reader and receive the 1st part for free. HERE
Picture Credits to: Deb Nystrom
I would love to get a star rating for this post:

Hi Luis,
I enjoyed reading your personal story.
Commenting on the firing people part: Every country and/or industry has its own legislative and procedural requirements before a company is able to make an employee redundant. Often these requirements include documented data about frequent discussions about bad performance, and a possibility for the employee to develop his performance. Again, each country has their own rules. In the states, you can be fired on the spot. In European countries, less so.
I’d not directly connect Perf Appr to this negative, and very rare use. Why I think performance appraisals are aged are the following reasons (very shortly, and I could discuss and speak about this subject for days…)
a) Goalsetting is based on an imaginary long term plan, which creates an imaginary annual plan which creates an imaginary budget, which steers most of the team’s goals and individual target setting. In most companies this process is too rigid, with too short cycles for the complex environment the organization is part of. No adaptability, and basically everything is mostly based on a small group’s guesses (Board or Exe team), who really can’t predict the future anyway.
b) Incentivizing individual (or team) targets always always leads to suboptimization. Incentive systems in corporations basically assume behavioristic motivational structures (“stick-carrot is the only thing molding your behavior”) which are true but only tap into a minor part of a human’s rewarding mechanisms.
c) Incentivizing an individual is plain ridiculous in the complex system we are working within in today’s knowledge work. You can be Michael Jordan, but if your system does not have a basketball your performance won’t be very good.
d) Who would you respect getting feedback from the most? Exactly. Rarely (at least in Western societies and among knowledge workers) the first answer is the manager, who really does not know what you are doing anyways. The most powerful feedback is your own learning and adapting, with constant feedback cycles from work/the ones impacted by your work, and hopefully some decent self-directed, calm and focused coaching sessions around your development. If there ought to be feedback discussions, you’d be most motivated to choose the person’s yourself. Otherwise it is very easy, with our biased brains, to disregard feedback from someone in our “out-group”. If there is negative feedback that could be processed with a highly professional coach (like me ;) in a trustful and safe setting. Only then a person is able to start thinking in new ways, which leads to new behavior.
e) Forced ranking. I’m not even starting with this, since it is so broken both scientifically and from a value adding perspective.
I’d like more people to think what Performance Management is for. Isn’t it for every employee to be able to work with his/her fullest potential and motivation towards creating value for the customers and company? I’m glad that many large corp’s have now really drastically changed their Perf mgmt strucutres, to be more a supporting practice instead of a controlling, assessing, saving-our-asses or reporting practice.
Happy to discuss more over a coffee sometime!
Riina
Hi Luis,
Interesting topics and stories. A complex area. I would tend to agree with Mike’s comment. Our performance in the company should interest us and everyone around too. How we do, interact, get better is important for growth. Our growth and the company we work for. Now, how it is actually embedded in hierarchy, process and history within organisations is fundamentally broken, because nobody benefits and it rarely represents “reality”. Too often the appraisal process literally interferes with work, is a nightmare overhead of red tape, useless forms and crazy HR deadlines. The biggest idiocy is needing them before EOY when everyone is working their hearts out to achieve the year goals. And I agree that human resources is a misnomer. Humans are not resources.
Thanks Philip :) Its always nice to have feedback.
Hi Luis,
in Italy things are different. In the majority of cases (99.99999 %) not either a bad performance appraisal can give the company the ability to fire someone. Anyway, I’m totally agree with you when you say that hardly a new manager will look at old datas gathered by an old manager - using PA as a law instrument is just an excuse. I believe that a constructive dialogue between a manager and their employees is the best way to understand what is happening in the business unit. We have to treat people as people, not as numbers on a piece of paper.
And please, let’s change the name by HR to HV where V is for Value ;)
I’m not sure what your argument is here Luis, is it against performance appraisals, or against annual performance appraisals? What you’ve done, by soliciting the information from your peers, is conduct a performance appraisal on yourself (which opens up a whole other set of questions based around the psychology of influence).
I’m not against performance appraisals when they’re done correctly. The language is ambiguous enough to allow for any kind of measure - subjective or objective - to stand as an appraisal. Annual ones are a waste of time as you’ve pointed out before, but on-the-spot, targeted and, importantly, objective appraisals are useful, both for the company and the individual being appraised.
Finally, your story, while underlining your point ably, does highlight the fact that, you completely ignored what your manager was asking you to do. Perhaps your manager believed they were the right objectives for you, but by ignoring them (and her) you’ve behaved in a way that has been disruptive, disrespectful and will no doubt have upset your manager (who isn’t a resource, but a person). The consequence of this behaviour is the beginning of disciplinary action and, frankly, I’m not surprised. Perhaps a better solution, right at the beginning when you were given the wrong objectives, would have been to use the opportunity to understand the reason for the objectives and discuss why you thought they were useless and what better ones could have been.
Your point about using performance appraisals for “performance managing” an employee out of a company (or defending ones position within a company) stands, however, if you get far enough through the process that it becomes a real option, then something is wrong with the company and it isn’t the objectives or their use.
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your comment :) I really do not agree with the statement that Appraisals are good :) I think they are useless and dangerous.
You mention: “I’m not against performance appraisals when they’re done correctly” This is like saying we are trying to the wrong thing righter ;)
And no I did not ignore what my manager was asking me to do, I focused on the topic that brought the biggest benefit for the organisation, but that is not the point of the blog post, the point of the blog post is to show there are several ways to get official feedback without the need to have this useless process.
You need Feedback, you need input from your manager and you need many other things but you do not need to have an useless process that is proven time after time (by the way Deming already said on the 60s how useless this practice is) to be completely wrong.
Did you have the opportunity to read the first and second part of the book? There I explain in detail how useless this practice is :)
Will be happy to discuss this further.
Luis
Luis,
Just keep on posting on this. I believe that “HR” (yes, an old wrong name) is having an indolence in trying contemporary practices and failing to see the change of needs in the modern working environment. The new environment is based on different values like trust, sharing, collaboration, experiments, safe to fail environment with empowered people. I usually say - if performance appraisals demotivate a single person (and they do) it means that such a routine is harmful to the values mentiond above.
This is one of my ‘favourite’ topics and I believe that until it dies, it needs hereos to speed up such a dying process.
Thanks Damir :) related to this very specific topic (Legal Stuff) do you see the need to expand it more or what I said cover it all?
Cheers,
Luis
I have never heard of performance appraisals expressly used as a legal requirement. However they are often used as documentation in a disciplinary process. Real time adult to adult conversation as we know is far more meaningful in helping people be their best, team based performance far more powerful when a team sets their own goals and holds each other to account via the social contract or in helping team members. For senior executives the traditional performance appraisal may fit but there again they should be appraised on results generated by their teams. For everyday people the performance appraisal can be meaningless.
An outdated construct based on flawed understanding of what motivates us as human beings.
Thanks Vanessa :)
And yes I heard many times the excuse about the legal part :) Performance Appraisals for many are like swiss knifes :) Used for many things but in reality not useful for most of the things :) Thanks for your comment :)
Thanks,
Luis